<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>San Diego Lawyer</title>
    <link>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php</link>
    <description></description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>scott4670@gmail.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2007</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2007-12-14T02:30:00-08:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.expressionengine.com/" />
    

    <item>
      <title>Amazing settlement offers.</title>
     <link>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/sean_ryan_versus_idearc_media_cum_verizon_saga_continues/</link>
      <guid>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/sean_ryan_versus_idearc_media_cum_verizon_saga_continues/</guid>
      <description>After the jury holds Verizon Directory Sales West Inc. and its successor Idearc Directory Sales West Inc. liable for wrongfully failing to tender wages, and conversion of its former sales representative&apos;s wages, its attorneys suggest that Sean Ryan abandon his efforts. Verizon &#45; Idearc walk away despite winning letter</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2007-12-14T02:30:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Torres v. City of San Diego</title>
     <link>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/government_officials_obtain_indemnity_under_government_code_sec_995/</link>
      <guid>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/government_officials_obtain_indemnity_under_government_code_sec_995/</guid>
      <description>City of San Diego employees successfully obtain a ruling ordering indemnity for acts and omission occurring in the course of the public employment.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2007-08-26T04:38:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>People v. Edward D. Jones &amp; Co</title>
     <link>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/state_of_california_pursues_action_for_securities_violations/</link>
      <guid>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/state_of_california_pursues_action_for_securities_violations/</guid>
      <description>Court of Appeals reinstated action by California against broker&#45;dealer for failing to adequately disclose to investors and potential investors certain &quot;shelf&#45;space&quot; agreements under which broker&#45;dealer received additional compensation for selling certain preferred mutual funds.  The court of appeals ruled that the action was not preempted by the National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996 because it is a type of action expressly permitted by that statute, and was not preempted by Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b&#45;10 because the action does not conflict with that rule.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2007-08-25T23:03:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>