<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>Labor Code 2699</title>
    <link>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php</link>
    <description></description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>cristen4670@gmail.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2009</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2009-03-18T01:35:00-08:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.expressionengine.com/" />
    

    <item>
      <title>Benitez v. Wilbur, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15018</title>
     <link>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_269925/</link>
      <guid>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_269925/</guid>
      <description>US District Court</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-03-18T00:35:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Sullivan v. Kelly Servs., Inc., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91608 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2008)</title>
     <link>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_269924/</link>
      <guid>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_269924/</guid>
      <description>US District Court Cases</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-03-18T00:20:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Im v. Jin Constr., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20377</title>
     <link>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_269923/</link>
      <guid>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_269923/</guid>
      <description>US District Court Decisions</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-03-18T00:13:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Fleming v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67749 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 15, 2006)</title>
     <link>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_269922/</link>
      <guid>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_269922/</guid>
      <description>US District Court Cases</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-03-17T23:53:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Swanson v. USProtect Corp., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37658 (N.D. Cal. May 10, 2007)</title>
     <link>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_269921/</link>
      <guid>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_269921/</guid>
      <description>District Court Cases</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-03-17T23:44:01-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Moreno v. Autozone, Inc., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43873 (N.D. Cal. June 5, 2007)</title>
     <link>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_269920/</link>
      <guid>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_269920/</guid>
      <description>District Court Cases</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-03-17T23:24:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Solis v. Regis Corp., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77327 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2006)</title>
     <link>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_269919/</link>
      <guid>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_269919/</guid>
      <description>District Court Cases</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-03-17T22:53:01-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Clark v. Chase Home Fin., LLC, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47295</title>
     <link>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_269918/</link>
      <guid>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_269918/</guid>
      <description>US District Court Cases</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-03-17T22:19:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Beebe v. Mobility, Inc., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12400 (S.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2008)</title>
     <link>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_269917/</link>
      <guid>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_269917/</guid>
      <description>District Court Cases</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-03-17T21:57:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Lopez v. Lassen Dairy, Inc., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89491 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2008)</title>
     <link>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_269916/</link>
      <guid>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_269916/</guid>
      <description>District Court Cases</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-03-17T21:45:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Singer v. Becton, Dickinson &amp; Co., Med Safe Sys., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56326 (S.D. Cal.  July 23, 2008)</title>
     <link>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_269915/</link>
      <guid>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_269915/</guid>
      <description>US District Court Rulings</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-03-17T21:11:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Kamar v. Radioshack Corp., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40581 (May 15, 2008)</title>
     <link>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_269914/</link>
      <guid>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_269914/</guid>
      <description>US District Court</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-03-17T19:49:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Waisbein v. UBS Fin. Servs., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62723 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2007)</title>
     <link>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_269913/</link>
      <guid>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_269913/</guid>
      <description>California District Court</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-03-16T01:10:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Waisbein v. UBS Fin. Servs., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92051 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2007)</title>
     <link>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_269912/</link>
      <guid>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_269912/</guid>
      <description>District Court Cases</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-03-16T01:03:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>De Simas v. Big Lots Stores, Inc., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19257 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 2, 2007)</title>
     <link>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_269911/</link>
      <guid>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_269911/</guid>
      <description>California District Court Cases</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-03-16T00:25:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Thomas v.. Home Depot USA, Inc. 2007 US Dist LEXIS 75489</title>
     <link>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_269910/</link>
      <guid>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_269910/</guid>
      <description>California District Court Cases</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-03-16T00:11:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Pulera v. F&amp;B, Inc., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72659 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2008)</title>
     <link>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_26999/</link>
      <guid>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_26999/</guid>
      <description>US District Court Cases</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-03-15T23:51:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Sinolinding v. United Staffing Solutions, 2008 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 305 (Cal. App. 2d Dist. 2008)</title>
     <link>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_26998/</link>
      <guid>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_26998/</guid>
      <description>California Court of Appeals</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-03-15T23:33:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1756, AFL CIO v. Superior Court, 148 Cal. App. 4th 39 (Cal. App. 2d Dist. 2007)</title>
     <link>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_26997/</link>
      <guid>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_26997/</guid>
      <description>Court of Appeals Cases</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-03-15T23:25:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Arias v. Superior Court, 153 Cal. App. 4th 777 (Cal. App. 3d Dist. 2007)</title>
     <link>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_26996/</link>
      <guid>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_26996/</guid>
      <description>California Court of Appeals</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-03-15T23:19:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Deleon v. Verizon Wireless, 2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 2530</title>
     <link>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_26995/</link>
      <guid>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_26995/</guid>
      <description>California Court of Appeals</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-03-15T22:50:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Dunlap v. Superior Court, 142 Cal. App. 4th 330 (Cal. App. 2d Dist. 2006)</title>
     <link>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_26994/</link>
      <guid>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_26994/</guid>
      <description>California Court of Appeals</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-03-15T22:25:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Caliber Bodyworks, Inc. v. Superior Court, 134 Cal. App. 4th 365 (Cal. App. 2d Dist. 2005)</title>
     <link>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_26993/</link>
      <guid>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_26993/</guid>
      <description>California Court of Appeals</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-03-15T22:12:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Amaral v. Cintas Corp. No. 2, 163 Cal. App. 4th 1157 (Cal. App. 1st Dist. 2008)</title>
     <link>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_26992/</link>
      <guid>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_26992/</guid>
      <description>CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEALS CASES</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-03-15T21:47:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Harrington v. Payroll Entertainment Services, Inc., 160 Cal. App. 4th 589</title>
     <link>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_26991/</link>
      <guid>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_26991/</guid>
      <description>CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEALS CASES</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-03-15T21:07:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Reynolds v. Bement, 36 Cal. 4th 1075, 1084 1085 (Cal. 2005)</title>
     <link>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_2699/</link>
      <guid>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/california_labor_code_section_2699/</guid>
      <description>California Supreme Court Cases</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-03-15T19:32:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Arias v. Superior Court (Angelo Dairy)</title>
     <link>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/2699_of_the_labor_code_does_not_require_class_procedures/</link>
      <guid>http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/index.php/mcmillan/display_article/2699_of_the_labor_code_does_not_require_class_procedures/</guid>
      <description>The Court of Appeal issued an alternative writ after the trial court struck the plaintiff&apos;s claims in part.  In overruling the trial court&apos;s action, the court of appeal ruled that Section 17200 of the Business and Professions code requires that a representative claim be brought as a class action because the UCL requires compliance with the class action provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 382.1 (Bus. &amp; Prof. Code, section 17203.) But, section 2699 of the Labor Code, otherwise known as PAGA, expressly allows a person to prosecute a representative claim without requiring that it be brought as a class action.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2007-08-26T05:23:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>